Gableman Accused Of Judicial Misconduct
Wisconsin Justice Faces Complaint Over Campaign Ad
Updated: 10:54 pm CDT October 7, 2008
MADISON, Wis. -- The state's newest Supreme Court Justice is facing charges from state regulators for an ad he ran during the campaign that falsely suggested his opponent freed a child molester.
VIDEO: Watch The ReportThe Wisconsin Judicial Commission alleges Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman violated the code of judicial conduct, which prevents judicial candidates from knowingly misrepresenting facts about their opponent.Gableman's campaign ran an ad in the Milwaukee area before the April election against Incumbent Justice Louis Butler claiming he found a "loophole" to free a convicted sex offender.The commission said Gableman knew an ad wasn't true when it claimed Butler found a "loophole" to free a child molester he had represented as a public defender.Gableman defeated incumbent Justice Louis Butler in the April election. At the time, Gableman was a little-known county judge from northwestern Wisconsin.Citizen Action of Wisconsin, a progressive citizen advocacy group dedicated to bringing transparency to the electoral system, filed the compliant with the Wisconsin Judicial Commission on March 18.One local government watchdog group said fallout from recent Supreme Court campaigns is cause for concern."People are seeing the Supreme Court splashed all over their television screens, but in an extraordinarily negative light," said Executive Director of Wisconsin Democracy Campaign, Mike McCabe. "What it's going to do is undermine the public's confidence in the court system, the Supreme Court in particular."The Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals will now select a panel of three appeals judges to conduct a hearing.Gableman's campaign spokesman said the complaint is without merit. Darrin Schmitz said in a statement, "The commission chose to ignore the plain language of the ad, which is factual. Instead the complaint alleges the ad contains false statements on the basis of inference and implication. The First Amendment does not allow a claim to be made on that basis."If he's found to have violated the code of conduct, Gableman could face discipline by other justices on the bench, which has happened before. Justice Annette Ziegler was publicly reprimanded for a conflict-of-interest violation last year.Stay tuned to WISC-TV and Channel 3000 for continuing coverage.
Previous Stories:
- July 11, 2008: Group Files Complaint Alleging Justice-Elect Engaged In Campaign Activities As DA
- April 3, 2008: Some Call For Changes In Supreme Court Races
- April 2, 2008: Voters Decide Local Leaders, Referenda Questions In Spring Election
- April 2, 2008: Gableman Upsets Butler In Supreme Court Race
- March 31, 2008: Gableman: Voters Have Clear Choice In Tuesday's Election
- March 29, 2008: Butler, Gableman Spar In Final State Supreme Court Debate
- March 29, 2008: 30 Judges Say Gableman Ad Marks New Low In Supreme Court Race
- March 28, 2008: Reality Check: Ad Attacking Gableman On Sex Offenders Makes Misleading Claims
- March 24, 2008: Butler, Gableman, Special Interests Weigh In On Supreme Court Race
- March 22, 2008: Dodge County DA Withdraws Support For Gableman Over Ad
- March 21, 2008: Group Files Complaint Over Gableman's E-mails
- March 19, 2008: Complaint Filed Over Gableman Campaign Ad In Supreme Court Race
- March 17, 2008: Monitoring Group Slams Gableman Ad Featuring Convicted Rapist
Copyright 2008 by Channel 3000. The Associated Press contributed to this report. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.



