High Court Seniority Works Just Fine
Why change after 125 years?
There are several reasons why we oppose a proposed constitutional amendment changing the process by which the chief justice of the Wisconsin Supreme Court is chosen, not the least of which is the current process of having the longest-serving justice serve as chief justice has worked just fine for almost 125 years.
Amending the state constitution is an involved and serious matter. It requires passage by two consecutive legislative sessions and then a statewide referendum. It is a long term solution to a big and intractable problem, which this matter is not. This matter is about Republicans not liking current chief justice Shirley Abrahamson who they view as making it difficult for the conservative majority on the court to consistently get its way. Nothing about this partisan disagreement goes away by changing the process to allow the justices to vote on their chief every two years. In fact we think it’ll make things worse.
There’s plenty that can be done to improve how the high court functions, most of which can be done within the chambers of the justices themselves. We need not amend the constitution to accomplish this.
Copyright 2013 by Channel 3000. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.