Results by Google

No-Fault Insurance Costs Drivers, Group Says

Mass. Drivers Could Save $200M, According To Study

Posted: 4:31 pm CST March 29, 2005

State lawmakers should repeal laws that require drivers to get "no-fault" auto insurance because it is more expensive, the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights says.

The group says that a study found that premiums are 19 percent lower in states that have personal responsibility as part of their insurance. It also says that the cost of insurance fell in states that repealed no-fault laws.

Rates also rose 92 percent faster in no-fault states between 1998 and 2002, the group said.

"No-fault has failed to live up to insurers' promises of lower insurance rates. Lower premiums can be achieved by repealing failed no-fault laws and instituting strict rate regulation," said Harvey Rosenfield, who unveiled the study.

He said Massachusetts residents, for example, could save $200 million by changing the laws.

The author said that no-fault systems are more expensive because they end up paying to both victims of accidents and those at fault, because mandatory payments encourage more medical treatment and fraud, and because limiting responsibility leads to more reckless driving.
Links We Like
Sponsored Content
If your credit is shabby, you'll need to shore up your score to convince a lender you're worthy. Here's how to boost your point total. More Details
Employers generally have options when it comes to hiring. Makes sure you present yourself as professionally as possible, or else. More Details
Explore the internet’s leading source for online universities and get financial help to further your education! More Details
People with type 2 diabetes can still enjoy restaurant meals with some planning and ahead-of-time menu sleuthing. More Details
Advertise With Us Advertise With Us