Results by Google

No-Fault Insurance Costs Drivers, Group Says

Mass. Drivers Could Save $200M, According To Study

Posted: 4:31 pm CST March 29, 2005

State lawmakers should repeal laws that require drivers to get "no-fault" auto insurance because it is more expensive, the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights says.

The group says that a study found that premiums are 19 percent lower in states that have personal responsibility as part of their insurance. It also says that the cost of insurance fell in states that repealed no-fault laws.

Rates also rose 92 percent faster in no-fault states between 1998 and 2002, the group said.

"No-fault has failed to live up to insurers' promises of lower insurance rates. Lower premiums can be achieved by repealing failed no-fault laws and instituting strict rate regulation," said Harvey Rosenfield, who unveiled the study.

He said Massachusetts residents, for example, could save $200 million by changing the laws.

The author said that no-fault systems are more expensive because they end up paying to both victims of accidents and those at fault, because mandatory payments encourage more medical treatment and fraud, and because limiting responsibility leads to more reckless driving.

Links We Like

Sponsored Content
Don’t ruin your chances of landing that new job by making easy to correct mistakes on your cover letter. More Details
You can pick your friends, but not your family -- or your neighbors. Here's what you need to know about how to deal with yours. More Details
Knowing how to talk about your psoriasis with loved ones, coworkers, and your doctor can you help you cope. Get more advice here. More Details
$4,000 scholarships are available to real people just like you! More Details
Advertise With Us Advertise With Us